Way back when, before my so-called career (ha!), I used to work in a hi-fi shop. It wasn't quite like this, though there were occasions when the customer's lack of technical knowledge could be advantageous. Upselling, I'd guess you'd call it these days. Don't judge me, it was a very low paid job with a commission element. Anyway, what I can say is that it was easy to sell expensive kit as long as it was demonstrably better. As long as I could demo a Sony CCD-TR805 camcorder I would sell it, more often than not, even though it was hideously expensive at £1,099.99, just because it was obviously so much better than everything else. Ditto the brilliant TCK-611S cassette deck, again expensive at £299.99 but an easy sell once demonstrated. Likewise the WM-DD33 Walkman (£99.99).
I was a good salesman, I think, because I made sure I knew my stuff, and used that knowledge to find something that matched the customer's needs. I enjoyed the job too, more often that not, and met a good mate there in the form of Tim, a friendship that endures to this day, despite rarely seeing each other.
I was interested in it all too, which is why I still knew those models numbers and prices instantly off the top of my head, despite my time there being more than 30 years ago. The brain's a funny thing, I guess. For the record, the 805 was a better camcorder because it had an optical image stabiliser (basically a clear gel between two lenses that acted as a dynamic prism) rather than the digital efforts of other brands, which tended to give grainy, pixelated results because they just didn't have the necessary processing power back then. And the 611S brought Dolby-S noise reduction to the domestic market, so much better than B and C; with a good quality blank tape (Sony Metal-XR, for example) the 611S would be the best way of recording CDs until MiniDisc and CD-Rs came along. As for the WM-DD33, well, DD stood for direct drive - no drive belts to stretch over time - plus it had heft! A sign of quality components, back then. Terry Hall had a WM-DD33, fact fans (and so did I).
I'll end with a track from a CD we used for demos, mostly because it was a DDD recording - digital recording equipment, digital mastering, digital media (rare then). With a good amp and decent speakers you could really appreciate the sound quality however much you liked the music ... and Sting irked the musos, even then. Here's the closing track from Ten Summoner's Tales, in all its 21st Century, compressed, low-bitrate, embedded YouTube misery. Does anyone care about sound quality any more?
That's a very Beatlesy outro there, isn't it?
Amazing what the brain retains from decades ago,but fails to remember what happened yesterday!
ReplyDeleteFor all the advances in technology my most enjoyable experiences with music were in the 80s from vinyl or cassettes played on the Hifi stacking system-it was just better in every way. Furthermore a 2 foot high system with turntable,twin cassettes and multi CD tray looked the business.
Ah yes, a proper stack. Like this one.
DeleteAlso... what happened yesterday? ;)
DeleteI've always loved that clip, perfect for your post. All this tech stuff goes way above my head but I'm sure you'd have been patient with me and sold me something just right for my needs and my budget. I do find it strange, though, that so many people now appear to be quite content with hearing their music compressed and low bitrate (I had to look that up) and yet desire and expect the imagery on TV/phone camera, etc. to be more HD, more intensely coloured, etc. than the way we actually see for real. Seems like one has gone backwards whilst the other forwards!
ReplyDeleteYes, sad (I think) that convenience and ubiquity are now more important than quality.
DeleteMy hearing's shot anyway, so I can't tell the difference between hi-fi quality and low bitrate rips anymore. As long as I can vaguely work out the lyrics, I'm happy enough.
ReplyDeleteWhen I bought my last turntable (probably about 30 years ago), a hifi-nut friend of mine got me to purchase a fancy one with even fancier speakers. It was so fancy that if you wanted to switch between 45 and 33, you had to lift up the turntable and swap the rubber band thing from one cog to another. I still don't know why that was considered better than a simple switch. (I don't own that turntable anymore, since I don't own any vinyl. I gave it to Ben, who appeared to appreciate it more than I ever did.)
Manually moving the drive belt? That sounds like a colossal faff. I find that the older I get, the less appetite I have for faff.
DeleteMe too. But I was hoping you could explain why it was considered better!
DeleteI'd question whether it was better, to be honest.
DeleteI'm calling Paul this second to tell him an expert is questioning his hifi snobbery!
DeleteWell, I'm 30+ years out of date, what can I say?
DeleteI hope you weren't as mean as Rowan and Griff! I'm sure you weren't. We used to have a few really specialist HiFi shops (if that's the term) in town but all now gone. Maybe now that vinyl has seen a comeback they will return. My dad finally invested in a quality sound system 6 months before I left home so I never really got the good of it.
ReplyDeleteAlyson
DeleteNot mean at all - don't sell much being mean!
Delete